<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cuil vs. Me.dium vs. Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://menro.me/2008/07/29/cuil-vs-medium-vs-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://menro.me/2008/07/29/cuil-vs-medium-vs-google/</link>
	<description>because I need answers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:02:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: menro</title>
		<link>http://menro.me/2008/07/29/cuil-vs-medium-vs-google/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[menro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 20:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scandium.wordpress.com/?p=174#comment-35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do not understand enough about Cuil to comment on their ability to predict trends, but I would guess they do not have enough query volume yet, to predict anything in a meaningful way. 

Me.dium has no where near Google&#039;s query volume either, but its users vet half billion web pages a month. This technique lends itself very well to trend type data. 

I would argue Me.dium could do as good, if not a better job than Google at predicting trends.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not understand enough about Cuil to comment on their ability to predict trends, but I would guess they do not have enough query volume yet, to predict anything in a meaningful way. </p>
<p>Me.dium has no where near Google&#8217;s query volume either, but its users vet half billion web pages a month. This technique lends itself very well to trend type data. </p>
<p>I would argue Me.dium could do as good, if not a better job than Google at predicting trends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curious</title>
		<link>http://menro.me/2008/07/29/cuil-vs-medium-vs-google/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[curious]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 08:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scandium.wordpress.com/?p=174#comment-34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about Google Trends?  How do Cuil and Medium&#039;s social search compare?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Google Trends?  How do Cuil and Medium&#8217;s social search compare?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Semantic Puzzle &#124; Cuil - bigger, better, semantic, more - or what?</title>
		<link>http://menro.me/2008/07/29/cuil-vs-medium-vs-google/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Semantic Puzzle &#124; Cuil - bigger, better, semantic, more - or what?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scandium.wordpress.com/?p=174#comment-26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Cuil vs. Me.dium vs. Google [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cuil vs. Me.dium vs. Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gfigg</title>
		<link>http://menro.me/2008/07/29/cuil-vs-medium-vs-google/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gfigg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scandium.wordpress.com/?p=174#comment-25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gfiggy from Me.dium here... thanks for the awesome post! 

The feedback has been great since launch - crowd powered search is definitely something the people need and we&#039;re busting our butts to bring you organic &quot;hot&quot; results. Let people tell you what&#039;s interesting, not corporations and ad $$!

What&#039;s really unique is that as the interest of the crowds change, so do your Me.dium search results so we&#039;re creating a new lens based on what&#039;s going on now.  e.g. do a search for John Edwards on Google or Cuil, and you get johnedwards.com and wiki/johnedwards.  Do the same search on Me.dium and you learn that today people care about his love child, pictures of his mistress, etc.

The difference is real-time (what people are browsing now) vs. historical (what they browsed in the past).  Social vs. Old School.  Check it out and let us know your thoughts.  http://me.dium.com/search.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gfiggy from Me.dium here&#8230; thanks for the awesome post! </p>
<p>The feedback has been great since launch &#8211; crowd powered search is definitely something the people need and we&#8217;re busting our butts to bring you organic &#8220;hot&#8221; results. Let people tell you what&#8217;s interesting, not corporations and ad $$!</p>
<p>What&#8217;s really unique is that as the interest of the crowds change, so do your Me.dium search results so we&#8217;re creating a new lens based on what&#8217;s going on now.  e.g. do a search for John Edwards on Google or Cuil, and you get johnedwards.com and wiki/johnedwards.  Do the same search on Me.dium and you learn that today people care about his love child, pictures of his mistress, etc.</p>
<p>The difference is real-time (what people are browsing now) vs. historical (what they browsed in the past).  Social vs. Old School.  Check it out and let us know your thoughts.  <a href="http://me.dium.com/search" rel="nofollow">http://me.dium.com/search</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

